IT suppliers concerned at poor planning for ID cards

Just three weeks since after overcoming opposition to ID cards in the House of Lords the Home Office has already published "10-year plan" for implementing the scheme.

Yet the 10 year plan reads like a sales brochure, and the IT industry is getting worried that the new Identity and Passport Service (IPS), whose plan it is, hasn't the faintest idea what it is doing.

Speaking before the 10 year plan was published this week, Jerry Fishenden, national technology offiver at Microsoft UK, told The Register that those IT suppliers that will be expected to implement the ID scheme are concerned about the blinkered approach the government has taken to its preparations.

Any healthy debate about the best way to build what will be the most ambitious project of its kind anywhere in the world has been bullied into submission.

... The London School of Economics report, which offered constructive criticism of the government's ID plans, attracted government derision.

The Home Office says it has been conducting a "market sounding" with hundreds of suppliers since last summer and it will publish the findings shortly.

Yet Fishenden said: "Most of the consultation appears to be about the procurement process rather than the system...there's not a diversity of opinion to cover off angles we've not even thought about."

There are better ways to make decisions, he said. It is a serious allegation as the ID scheme is at its most crucial early stages. IT projects are guaranteed to fail or go massively over budget if they are not thought out properly and specified thoroughly from the outset. It is a common failing of projects driven by a narrow, political agenda.

Fishenden reckoned the government's plans to date look immature and is concerned that they will end up imposing a mismatched, potholed plan on an ungrateful public ...

...The government's aim to have a basic ID scheme up and running before the next election looks fatefully ambitious. Experts reckon the procurement process, should it start immediately, may take till the end of the year.

Then what is being proposed is no accounting system. It is one of the most ambitious projects, with the most alarming social consequences, ever undertaken. Biometric technology is unproven on armies of co-operative corporate drones. It may not be easy to get it working on a population of 60m people, many of whom will resist its imposition. That's another significant reason for the failure of major IT projects - what they call "user acceptance"; or as government ministers would have it nowadays, "customer satisfaction".